🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are channeling hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing national machine learning technologies. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to build AI that understands native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Battle

This trend is an element in a larger worldwide race spearheaded by major corporations from the US and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest massive resources, developing countries are additionally making independent investments in the AI landscape.

Yet with such huge sums at stake, can smaller nations achieve notable benefits? As noted by an expert from an influential thinktank, “Unless you’re a rich government or a big corporation, it’s a significant hardship to develop an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Issues

A lot of countries are reluctant to rely on overseas AI systems. In India, for example, American-made AI systems have sometimes been insufficient. An illustrative instance saw an AI agent used to instruct learners in a isolated community – it spoke in English with a pronounced American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Additionally there’s the defence factor. In India’s security agencies, using certain external AI tools is considered inadmissible. According to a founder explained, It's possible it contains some random training dataset that may state that, such as, a certain region is outside of India … Employing that specific model in a military context is a serious concern.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to people who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on American systems because data could travel abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Initiatives

In response, several nations are backing domestic projects. One such a project is underway in the Indian market, in which a firm is attempting to create a domestic LLM with public support. This effort has dedicated about 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The developer foresees a model that is significantly smaller than top-tier models from Western and Eastern tech companies. He explains that the country will have to compensate for the financial disparity with talent. Located in India, we don’t have the luxury of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the America is devoting? I think that is where the key skills and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Regional Emphasis

Across Singapore, a public project is backing language models educated in south-east Asia’s native tongues. Such languages – including the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Indonesian, the Khmer language and others – are commonly poorly represented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are developing these independent AI models were conscious of the extent to which and how quickly the leading edge is progressing.

A senior director involved in the initiative says that these tools are designed to supplement bigger AI, as opposed to replacing them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he comments, frequently struggle with regional languages and local customs – speaking in stilted Khmer, for instance, or proposing pork-based recipes to Malaysian individuals.

Creating native-tongue LLMs allows state agencies to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced system built overseas.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the word national. I think what we’re trying to say is we aim to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the features” of AI technologies.

Multinational Partnership

For states trying to find their place in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: join forces. Researchers affiliated with a respected policy school recently proposed a state-owned AI venture distributed among a group of emerging states.

They call the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European successful strategy to create a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. This idea would involve the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of several countries’ AI projects – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the US and Chinese leaders.

The main proponent of a paper setting out the proposal states that the concept has drawn the interest of AI officials of at least several nations so far, as well as multiple state AI organizations. Although it is now focused on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also expressed interest.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the promises of the present White House. Experts are questioning like, can I still depend on these technologies? Suppose they choose to